Below is the introduction to my theoretical foundations for my Qualitative Descriiptive Study of How openly gay baptist-affiliated men describe how adolescent religious experiences influence the formation of adult self-identity.Instructions are to enhance the below paragraph. I do not need a new introduction; only add to the information to address the following.Please look at all sources for accuracy, but especially the references of Klingenberg & Sjö, 2019; I believe this reference was cited in error as I have read this study and find no mention of Erickson. Please change to a source that references Erickson within the last three years. Also, please add within this paragraph why Erickson should still be used as a model for development in 2022. Address How do psychologists still receive Erikson in terms of LGBTQ+ individuals? Our understanding of the LGBTQ+ community has changed much since 1968.