Zack made the provocative claim that “inclusive philosophical feminism is on a c


Zack made the provocative claim that “inclusive philosophical feminism is on a collision course with intersectionality” (200), while Carastathis wrote that “a serious engagement recognizes that intersectionality signals a point of departure, not the arrival of anti-racist feminist theory” (70).What did they mean in making these claims, and would you agree with one or both? (Remember that their conclusions do tend to point in different directions.)As always, do your best to respond to the questions, but don’t stress about the usual formalities of essay writing. Just be sure to say what you want to say, and do so as clearly as possible. It’s not meant to be a definitive statement of your views, but a step in the process of thinking things through. Aim for about 500 words.